Thinking Fast and Slow: Unraveling the Mind's Two Systems 🧠💡
✕
Facebook
WhatsApp
X
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
✕
Strict use of scripts:“Before diving into the book, let's start with a question: do you think you are more of an impulsive person or a rational one? After finishing this book, see if you still hold the same answer. As we all know, the human brain has two systems, which Daniel Kahneman refers to as System 1 and System 2 in his book. Simply put, they are the intuitive system and the rational system. Here's how the book defines these two systems: System 1 operates unconsciously and quickly, with little effort and under complete automatic control. System 2 shifts attention to activities that require mental effort. System 1 is like a robot—light and efficient, but a bit dumb. In contrast, System 2 is lazy and slow, consuming a lot of energy, but it is more comprehensive and clear. When external problems arise, System 1 is the first to step in. Only when it feels that it can't handle the problem does it let System 2 take over. The issue is, sometimes System 1 tries too hard to do the work and simplifies complex problems into a story for System 2, making System 2 think it doesn't need to intervene. Another experiment in the book asks participants to choose which of two lines in a picture is longer. Due to visual bias, most people choose the second line, but in fact, both lines are the same length. This is an example of System 1 telling a story to System 2. Kahneman calls this phenomenon "heuristics" or the "priming effect." Once System 2 buys into System 1's story, cognitive biases arise. What different kinds of biases might emerge? The book shares dozens of them, but due to space limitations, we'll cover two typical ones in this reading. The first is called "Prospect Theory." This is one of the core theories of the book. Let’s do a quick test: imagine there are two boxes. Open Box A, and you'll definitely get $9,000. Open Box B, and you have a 90% chance of winning $10,000, but a 10% chance of getting nothing. Which would you choose, A or B? Now consider another scenario: you need to compensate someone financially, and you have two options. Option one: pay $9,000 immediately. Option two: draw a lottery, where there is a 90% chance you'll have to pay $10,000, but a 10% chance you won't have to pay anything. Would you choose option one or option two? From the perspective of expected value, both choices are the same, but I believe more people would choose A over B, and more would pick option one over option two. Why is that? Because the pain of loss is much stronger for us than the pleasure of gain. This is the so-called "Prospect Theory," also known as "Loss Aversion Theory." The certainty of getting $9,000 feels better than the possibility of winning $10,000, even though the expected value is the same. Similarly, the potential loss of $10,000 feels worse than the certainty of losing $9,000, even though their expected values are identical. This might also explain why gamblers are so driven to win back their losses. Another core bias in the book is the "Endowment Effect." This is linked to loss aversion and refers to the tendency for people to value things more once they own them. For example, you're a die-hard fan of a singer, and after a lot of effort, you managed to buy a concert ticket for $500. You think the highest price you'd be willing to pay is around $1,000. But someone who didn't get a ticket offers you $1,500 for yours, and you refuse. It's only when they offer $3,000 that you start to waver. Why did your initial valuation of $1,000 suddenly jump to $3,000? Because the pain of losing the ticket is much greater than the joy of getting it. The endowment effect is common in everyday life. For instance, someone who owns a house may know the price is declining but refuses to sell because they once owned something worth several times the current value, even though that's just an illusion. People in auctions can't help but raise their bids because, in their minds, they already feel they own the item. Couples who constantly argue and are fed up with each other think about the good times once they separate. Such phenomena happen often. The last part of the book introduces a fascinating concept called the "Peak-End Rule." It states that our judgment of whether something is pleasurable or painful has little to do with the entire experience but is based on the peaks and the ending of the experience. Take the example of tooth extraction, a painful process many of us have experienced. There are two options: Option A lasts only 10 minutes, with moderate pain during the process but a sharp, violent pain at the end that lasts for a few seconds. Option B lasts 20 minutes, with similar levels of pain throughout but a much gentler ending. Which would you choose, A or B? Many people might still choose A, thinking "better short pain than long pain," since B involves enduring twice as long. However, studies show that most people recall the pain of option B as less severe than A, even though B lasts longer. We tend to overlook the process, and the ending determines our final perception. So how does a person evaluate whether they are happy? Kahneman says we each have two selves: the "experiencing self" and the "remembering self." The experiencing self refers to the actual feelings at the moment things happen, while the remembering self is the feeling you recall afterward. No matter how much happiness the experiencing self feels during an event, if the peak and ending are unpleasant, the entire memory of it will be unhappy. Conversely, if the majority of the experience was painful, but the peak and ending feel good, the entire memory will be happy. For example, when we look back on our high school days, we may have felt miserable at the time, but now we often long to go back. After reading this book, the biggest takeaway, as Taleb once said, is that humans aren't much different from the monkeys of millions of years ago. Although we feel like we've become rational and wise, this sense of reason is just another illusion created by System 1. In reality, System 2 is almost always no match for System 1. Interestingly, when we fully accept this and acknowledge that we are like monkeys, we can create a little space in our minds, where System 2 is always on standby, ready to reduce the biases we hold. This might be the book's greatest value.” Title Usage:“Thinking, Fast and Slow®” The content is in English with English-Chinese bilingual subtitles. This is a comprehensive summary of the book Using Hollywood production values and cinematic style.
Use This Prompt
close
Home
TV
Light Mode
Hashtags
Educational
Cinematic
Informative
Documentary
Animation
教育
Short-form
Inspirational
